Dependability evaluation is an important often-mandatory step in designing and analyzing (critical) systems. Introducing control and/or computing devices to automate processes increases the system complexity, with an impact on the overall dependability. This occurs as a consequence of interferences, dependencies, and other similar effects that cannot be adequately managed through formalisms such as reliability block diagrams (RBDs), fault trees (FTs), and reliability graphs (RGs), since the statistical independence assumption is not satisfied. In addition, more enhanced notations such as dynamic FTs (DFTs) might not be adequate to represent all the behavioral aspects of dynamic systems. To overcome these problems, we developed a new formalism derived from RBD: the dynamic RBD (DRBD). DRBD exploits the concept of dependence as the building block to represent dynamic behaviors, allowing us to compose the dependencies and adequately manage the arising conflicts by means of a priority algorithm. In this paper, we explain how we can use the DRBD notation by specifying a practical methodology. Starting from the system knowledge, the proposed methodology drives to the overall system reliability evaluation through the entire phases of modeling and analysis. Such a technique is applied to an example taken from the literature, consisting of a distributed computing system

Dependability Evaluation with Dynamic Reliability Block Diagrams and Dynamic Fault Trees

DISTEFANO, SALVATORE;PULIAFITO, Antonio
2009-01-01

Abstract

Dependability evaluation is an important often-mandatory step in designing and analyzing (critical) systems. Introducing control and/or computing devices to automate processes increases the system complexity, with an impact on the overall dependability. This occurs as a consequence of interferences, dependencies, and other similar effects that cannot be adequately managed through formalisms such as reliability block diagrams (RBDs), fault trees (FTs), and reliability graphs (RGs), since the statistical independence assumption is not satisfied. In addition, more enhanced notations such as dynamic FTs (DFTs) might not be adequate to represent all the behavioral aspects of dynamic systems. To overcome these problems, we developed a new formalism derived from RBD: the dynamic RBD (DRBD). DRBD exploits the concept of dependence as the building block to represent dynamic behaviors, allowing us to compose the dependencies and adequately manage the arising conflicts by means of a priority algorithm. In this paper, we explain how we can use the DRBD notation by specifying a practical methodology. Starting from the system knowledge, the proposed methodology drives to the overall system reliability evaluation through the entire phases of modeling and analysis. Such a technique is applied to an example taken from the literature, consisting of a distributed computing system
2009
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11570/1832782
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 80
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 55
social impact