“The Right to Strike in the EU. The complexity of the norms and safeguarding efficacy” is the title of a volume ideated by prof. Carmen La Macchia presenting the results of a research project funded by the European Commission, on the regulation of the strike in nine EU Member Countries: Bulgaria, France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, Poland, Romania, Spain, and Sweden. The national reports were formulated by university professors Plamenka Markova, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (Bulgaria); Antoine Lyon-Caen, Université de Paris Ouest, Nanterre, (France); Eva Kocher, Europa-Universität Viadrina, Frankfurt/Oder (Germany); Giuseppe Ferraro, Università degli Studi di Napoli «FedericoII». (Italy); Andrzej Swiatkowski, Jagiellonian University, Cracovia (Poland); Keith Ewing, King’s College London (UK); Antonio Baylos Grau, Universidad de Castilla, La Mancha (Spain); and Laura Carlson, Stockholm University (Sweden). An essay by Carmen La Macchia comparing and contrasting the different national systems completes the volume. The national reports and La Macchia’s essay also analyze the consequences of the Viking and Laval decisions, describing the profound differences between the various national systems of industrial relations, and above all revealing alarming factors of inequality in the European integration process. National regulations of the exercise of the right to strike are, in fact, highly differentiated, above all in the degree to which they ensure the efficacy of collective action. In many countries, commitment to the principles set forth in the international and Community charters is fictitious, and there is no adequate means of monitoring the effectiveness of protection.
The Right to Strike in the EU - The complexity of the normsand safeguarding efficacy
LA MACCHIA, Carmela
2011-01-01
Abstract
“The Right to Strike in the EU. The complexity of the norms and safeguarding efficacy” is the title of a volume ideated by prof. Carmen La Macchia presenting the results of a research project funded by the European Commission, on the regulation of the strike in nine EU Member Countries: Bulgaria, France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, Poland, Romania, Spain, and Sweden. The national reports were formulated by university professors Plamenka Markova, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (Bulgaria); Antoine Lyon-Caen, Université de Paris Ouest, Nanterre, (France); Eva Kocher, Europa-Universität Viadrina, Frankfurt/Oder (Germany); Giuseppe Ferraro, Università degli Studi di Napoli «FedericoII». (Italy); Andrzej Swiatkowski, Jagiellonian University, Cracovia (Poland); Keith Ewing, King’s College London (UK); Antonio Baylos Grau, Universidad de Castilla, La Mancha (Spain); and Laura Carlson, Stockholm University (Sweden). An essay by Carmen La Macchia comparing and contrasting the different national systems completes the volume. The national reports and La Macchia’s essay also analyze the consequences of the Viking and Laval decisions, describing the profound differences between the various national systems of industrial relations, and above all revealing alarming factors of inequality in the European integration process. National regulations of the exercise of the right to strike are, in fact, highly differentiated, above all in the degree to which they ensure the efficacy of collective action. In many countries, commitment to the principles set forth in the international and Community charters is fictitious, and there is no adequate means of monitoring the effectiveness of protection.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
