In this short chapter, using a deliberately schematic form, the authors summarize all the points of agreement, dissonance and possible integration of the two models compared here: the Chomskyan Biolinguistic Model (CBM) and Darwinian Biolinguistic Model (DBM). The schematic content anticipates the detailed discussions which will follow in the chapters in the second part of the book and which are dedicated to the exposition of the main biolinguistics issues interpreted through an evolutionary approach. © Springer International Publishing AG 2016.

Comparing two models: CBM vs DBM

Pennisi, Antonino;Falzone, Alessandra
2016-01-01

Abstract

In this short chapter, using a deliberately schematic form, the authors summarize all the points of agreement, dissonance and possible integration of the two models compared here: the Chomskyan Biolinguistic Model (CBM) and Darwinian Biolinguistic Model (DBM). The schematic content anticipates the detailed discussions which will follow in the chapters in the second part of the book and which are dedicated to the exposition of the main biolinguistics issues interpreted through an evolutionary approach. © Springer International Publishing AG 2016.
2016
978-3-319-47686-5
978-3-319-47688-9
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11570/3129325
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact