Volumes of text have been written about the necessity of cross-cultural communication in global organizations, particularly in business (Moran et al. 2007). Communication was reported to be an important core mechanism of support strategy processes for sustainable development (OECD 2001). The cooperation of stakeholders depends on it (GTZ Rioplus, 2006). Very little research has been done on effective sustainable development multicultural teams. Sustainable development project creation and implementation is highly impacted by cultural differences and communication differences. Members of international commissions need to be able to communicate with each other in creation and implementation of important sustainable development projects. The purpose of this study is to examine the state of cross-cultural communication involving two significant players in the arena of sustainable development: the African Union and the European Union. Cultural differences between the AU and EU are discussed and areas of communication breakdown are identified. Some styles represented in the EU seemed to be more apt to promote misunderstandings and breakdowns in the communication process. Recommendations include comprehensive crosscultural communication. Cross-cultural training to develop strategic communication beneficial to facilitating relationship formation, teamwork and coherence in project implementation is highly recommended. More research is necessary in methods for creating cultural synergy, solving problems in mindful ways and adjusting styles to fit the other team members.

African Union and European sustainable development projects: cross-cultural traps in multicultural teams

Mary Ellen Toffle
2018-01-01

Abstract

Volumes of text have been written about the necessity of cross-cultural communication in global organizations, particularly in business (Moran et al. 2007). Communication was reported to be an important core mechanism of support strategy processes for sustainable development (OECD 2001). The cooperation of stakeholders depends on it (GTZ Rioplus, 2006). Very little research has been done on effective sustainable development multicultural teams. Sustainable development project creation and implementation is highly impacted by cultural differences and communication differences. Members of international commissions need to be able to communicate with each other in creation and implementation of important sustainable development projects. The purpose of this study is to examine the state of cross-cultural communication involving two significant players in the arena of sustainable development: the African Union and the European Union. Cultural differences between the AU and EU are discussed and areas of communication breakdown are identified. Some styles represented in the EU seemed to be more apt to promote misunderstandings and breakdowns in the communication process. Recommendations include comprehensive crosscultural communication. Cross-cultural training to develop strategic communication beneficial to facilitating relationship formation, teamwork and coherence in project implementation is highly recommended. More research is necessary in methods for creating cultural synergy, solving problems in mindful ways and adjusting styles to fit the other team members.
2018
978-86-80194-12-7
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Toffle_AFRICAN-UNION-AND-EUROPEAN-SUSTAINABLE-DEVELOPMENT-PROJECTS-CROSS-CULTURAL-TRAPS-IN-MULTICULTURAL-TEAMS_pp_2-15.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 317.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
317.04 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
ERAZ 2018 FOURTH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 7.37 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.37 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11570/3285840
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact