Forerunner of the Koine or Attic Bee? The Reception of Xenophon in the Imperial Age

The presence of Xenophon in the paideia of the Imperial age has been well established. The works of Dio of Prusa and Arrian have already showed the success of Xenophon’s literature in this period. However, if, according to the Suda, he deserved to be called “Attic bee”, reservations about the Attic purity of Xenophon’s language have been expressed since ancient times, namely in Atticist lexicography. Nevertheless, the fact that a severe Atticist like the orator Ælius Aristides often chose to imitate Xenophon, suggests that this classical author must have been considered as a pure Attic model. Certainly, the Atticism of Aristide is not just linguistic as it shows the presence of a wider archaism. His Leuctran Speeches and his Panathenaicus reuse many expressions and themes that come from Xenophon’s different works. This chapter presents some cases of linguistic and literary reception of Xenophon in the works of Aristides, which can provide new evidence for the debate on Xenophon’s “controversial” inclusion in the Attic canon.