In this conference proceeding we examine a correlation between the afterglow luminosity (measured at rest frame 200 s; log L_200s ) and average afterglow decay rate (measured from rest frame 200 s onwards; α>200s) found in both the optical/UV and X-ray afterglows of long duration Gamma-ray Bursts (GRBs). Examining the X-ray light curves, we find the correlation does not depend on the presence of specific light curve features. We explore how the parameters in the optical/UV and X-ray bands relate to each other and to the prompt emission phase. We also use a Monte Carlo simulation to explore whether these relationships are consistent with predictions of the standard afterglow model. We conclude that the correlations are consistent with a common underlying physical mechanism producing GRBs and their afterglows regardless of their detailed temporal behaviour. However, a basic afterglow model has difficulty explaining correlations involving α>200s. We therefore briefly discuss alternative more complex models.
Exploring the canonical behaviour of long gamma-ray bursts with an intrinsic multiwavelength afterglow correlation
De Pasquale, M.;
2020-01-01
Abstract
In this conference proceeding we examine a correlation between the afterglow luminosity (measured at rest frame 200 s; log L_200s ) and average afterglow decay rate (measured from rest frame 200 s onwards; α>200s) found in both the optical/UV and X-ray afterglows of long duration Gamma-ray Bursts (GRBs). Examining the X-ray light curves, we find the correlation does not depend on the presence of specific light curve features. We explore how the parameters in the optical/UV and X-ray bands relate to each other and to the prompt emission phase. We also use a Monte Carlo simulation to explore whether these relationships are consistent with predictions of the standard afterglow model. We conclude that the correlations are consistent with a common underlying physical mechanism producing GRBs and their afterglows regardless of their detailed temporal behaviour. However, a basic afterglow model has difficulty explaining correlations involving α>200s. We therefore briefly discuss alternative more complex models.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
MULTIF2019_058.pdf.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
462.91 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
462.91 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.