Event cameras are increasingly considered for humanoid human-robot interaction (HRI) because their asynchronous output can preserve fast facial micro-dynamics under motion blur and difficult illumination. The field lacks standardized protocols, covering sensor settings, event integration windows, and evaluation metrics, which limits quantitative comparison across studies and makes robot-mounted transfer uncertain. This PRISMA-ScR scoping review consolidates the emerging evidence through a six-layer taxonomy, spanning sensing to deployability. Across the charted literature, support is strongest for region of interest (ROI)/landmark front-end components and paired-capture supervision. In contrast, humanoid-critical factors, ego-motion quantification, still-user low-motion “signal starvation,” motion-generalization testing, and end-to-end timing, are rarely operationalized as explicit axes. We translate these gaps into a minimal benchmark and on-humanoid dataset direction centered on Facial Action Units and operational engagement proxies, with paired RGB-event capture, logged motion metadata, and reproducible reporting of integration settings and latency.

EVENT CAMERAS FOR HUMANOID SOCIAL PERCEPTION: A SCOPING REVIEW OF FACIAL DYNAMICS AND DEPLOYMENT EVIDENCE

Serghini O.
Primo
;
Serrano S.
Secondo
;
Scarpa M. L.
Penultimo
;
2026-01-01

Abstract

Event cameras are increasingly considered for humanoid human-robot interaction (HRI) because their asynchronous output can preserve fast facial micro-dynamics under motion blur and difficult illumination. The field lacks standardized protocols, covering sensor settings, event integration windows, and evaluation metrics, which limits quantitative comparison across studies and makes robot-mounted transfer uncertain. This PRISMA-ScR scoping review consolidates the emerging evidence through a six-layer taxonomy, spanning sensing to deployability. Across the charted literature, support is strongest for region of interest (ROI)/landmark front-end components and paired-capture supervision. In contrast, humanoid-critical factors, ego-motion quantification, still-user low-motion “signal starvation,” motion-generalization testing, and end-to-end timing, are rarely operationalized as explicit axes. We translate these gaps into a minimal benchmark and on-humanoid dataset direction centered on Facial Action Units and operational engagement proxies, with paired RGB-event capture, logged motion metadata, and reproducible reporting of integration settings and latency.
2026
978-3-937436-90-6
978-3-937436-89-0
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11570/3357451
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact