PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to verify, by applying clinical performance indicators, the quality of healthcare given to hysterectomy patients and the benefits on their adoption in healthcare facilities.METHODS: The different surgical approaches and indications for surgery were evaluated in 534 patients analysing postoperative short-term complications and triggered clinical performance indicators (CPIs).RESULTS: Surgery was performed by the abdominal (80.9%) and vaginal route (19.1%). Postoperative complication rate was 13.5% and CPIs were triggered 108 times overall: 42 in benign conditions (10.3%) and 30 in malignancy (23.4%) (p = 0.001). In patients operated on for benign conditions the different approaches, abdominal or vaginal, showed differences in postoperative period (p = 0.4). In 10.9% of malignant and in 2.9% of benign conditions hospital stay was triggered (p = 0.001). Vaginal surgery showed a shorter average stay than laparotomy (p = 0.001).CONCLUSION: The use of CPIs may determine a refinement of clinical performance with positive effects on health, patient satisfaction, postoperative morbidity hospitalisation and healthcare cost savings.

Hysterectomy: Benefits of clinical performance indicators in the evaluation of healthcare facilities.

MANCUSO, Alfredo;DE VIVO, ANTONIO;TRIOLO, Onofrio;IRATO, Stefano;
2005-01-01

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to verify, by applying clinical performance indicators, the quality of healthcare given to hysterectomy patients and the benefits on their adoption in healthcare facilities.METHODS: The different surgical approaches and indications for surgery were evaluated in 534 patients analysing postoperative short-term complications and triggered clinical performance indicators (CPIs).RESULTS: Surgery was performed by the abdominal (80.9%) and vaginal route (19.1%). Postoperative complication rate was 13.5% and CPIs were triggered 108 times overall: 42 in benign conditions (10.3%) and 30 in malignancy (23.4%) (p = 0.001). In patients operated on for benign conditions the different approaches, abdominal or vaginal, showed differences in postoperative period (p = 0.4). In 10.9% of malignant and in 2.9% of benign conditions hospital stay was triggered (p = 0.001). Vaginal surgery showed a shorter average stay than laparotomy (p = 0.001).CONCLUSION: The use of CPIs may determine a refinement of clinical performance with positive effects on health, patient satisfaction, postoperative morbidity hospitalisation and healthcare cost savings.
2005
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11570/1706947
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact