OBJECTIVE: We investigated how pathologic Q waves or equivalents predict location, size and transmural extent of myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: MI characteristics, detected by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, were compared with 12-lead electrocardiogram in 79 patients with previous first MI. RESULTS:Q waves involved only the anterior leads (V1-V4) in 13 patients: in all patients MI involved the anterior and anteroseptal walls and apex; 81% of scar tissue was within these regions. Q waves involved only the inferior leads (II, III, aVF) in 13 patients: in 12 of these patients MI involved the inferior and inferoseptal walls; however, only 59% of scar occupied these regions. Q waves involved only lateral leads (V5, V6, I, aVL) in 11 patients: in nine of these patients MI involved the lateral wall but only 27% of scar tissue was within this wall. Q waves involved two electrocardiogram locations in 42 patients. In the 79 patients as a whole, the number of anterior Q waves was related to anterior MI size (r=0.70); however, the number of inferior and lateral Q waves was only weakly related to MI size in corresponding territories (r=0.35 and 0.33). A tall and broad R wave in V1-V2 was a more powerful predictor of lateral MI size than Q waves. Finally, the number of Q waves accurately reflected the transmural extent of the infarction (r=0.70) only in anterior infarctions. CONCLUSION: Q waves reliably predict MI location, size and transmural extent only in patients with anterior infarction. A tall and broad R wave in V1-V2 reflects a lateral MI.

Q-wave prediction of myocardial infarct location, size and transmural extent at magnetic resonance imaging

DI BELLA, Gianluca;
2007

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We investigated how pathologic Q waves or equivalents predict location, size and transmural extent of myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: MI characteristics, detected by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, were compared with 12-lead electrocardiogram in 79 patients with previous first MI. RESULTS:Q waves involved only the anterior leads (V1-V4) in 13 patients: in all patients MI involved the anterior and anteroseptal walls and apex; 81% of scar tissue was within these regions. Q waves involved only the inferior leads (II, III, aVF) in 13 patients: in 12 of these patients MI involved the inferior and inferoseptal walls; however, only 59% of scar occupied these regions. Q waves involved only lateral leads (V5, V6, I, aVL) in 11 patients: in nine of these patients MI involved the lateral wall but only 27% of scar tissue was within this wall. Q waves involved two electrocardiogram locations in 42 patients. In the 79 patients as a whole, the number of anterior Q waves was related to anterior MI size (r=0.70); however, the number of inferior and lateral Q waves was only weakly related to MI size in corresponding territories (r=0.35 and 0.33). A tall and broad R wave in V1-V2 was a more powerful predictor of lateral MI size than Q waves. Finally, the number of Q waves accurately reflected the transmural extent of the infarction (r=0.70) only in anterior infarctions. CONCLUSION: Q waves reliably predict MI location, size and transmural extent only in patients with anterior infarction. A tall and broad R wave in V1-V2 reflects a lateral MI.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11570/1794839
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 36
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
social impact