The discovery of nephrouroameba: Was it real or not?

n 1938 Procaccini showed scientific interest in a new kind of ameba, and called it "nephrouroameba" from which the disease "nephrouroamebiasis" is derived. He wrote a paper titled "La Nefrouroamoebiasi" thus describing its history, the biopathogenetic evolutionary cycle of the protozoon, its therapeutic, epidemiological, anatomo-biological, diagnostic, cultural, biological and morphological features. Between 1934 and 1939, Procaccini had the opportunity to follow many patients belonging to a group of Italian soldiers serving in the Eastern Italian Army in Ethiopia. At that time he was responsible for the biopathological laboratory. After a short preclinical stage of fatigue, patients suffering from nephrouroamebiasis showed a nephrotic syndrome with gross hematuria. The symptoms ceased within a few days but residual microhematuria, albuminuria and urine casts persisted for many months. After microscopic observation, he reproduced some protozoons and classified them as a kind of ameba. Critical analysis of his report leads to the morphological identification of Trichomonas, thus excluding his classification as nephrouroamebas.