C nanotubes are synthesized by catalytic route on ceramic supports (Al2O3, MgO and CaO), usually utilized for polymer reinforcing/flame-retardancy, aiming at nanotube-based hybrid preparation. Chemical vapor deposition is carried out in i-C4H10+H2 atmosphere over 17 wt% Fe-catalysts upon different conditions. In order to clarify the influence of support material, calcination (450 C or 750 C) and reduction temperature (500 C or 600 C) of the catalysts, and synthesis temperature (600 C or 700 C), catalysts utilized and nanotubes obtained are systematically investigated by the use of several analysis techniques (electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, thermo-gravimetry and Raman spectroscopy). The results obtained show that, in the considered range of variation, support material is the most influential parameter. The most catalytically active alumina supports allow achieving higher yields, but involve larger metallic inclusions and lower crystalline quality. Remaining supports behave oppositely. The reasons for such differences are discussed in the light of the current assessments on the nanotube growth and the results obtained are compared with those available in literature for similar catalysts.
Growth and Analysis of C Nanotubes on Ceramic Polymer-Additives
PIPEROPOULOS, Elpida;MILONE, Candida
2012-01-01
Abstract
C nanotubes are synthesized by catalytic route on ceramic supports (Al2O3, MgO and CaO), usually utilized for polymer reinforcing/flame-retardancy, aiming at nanotube-based hybrid preparation. Chemical vapor deposition is carried out in i-C4H10+H2 atmosphere over 17 wt% Fe-catalysts upon different conditions. In order to clarify the influence of support material, calcination (450 C or 750 C) and reduction temperature (500 C or 600 C) of the catalysts, and synthesis temperature (600 C or 700 C), catalysts utilized and nanotubes obtained are systematically investigated by the use of several analysis techniques (electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, thermo-gravimetry and Raman spectroscopy). The results obtained show that, in the considered range of variation, support material is the most influential parameter. The most catalytically active alumina supports allow achieving higher yields, but involve larger metallic inclusions and lower crystalline quality. Remaining supports behave oppositely. The reasons for such differences are discussed in the light of the current assessments on the nanotube growth and the results obtained are compared with those available in literature for similar catalysts.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.