La (parziale) riconversione delle "questioni di interpretazione" in questioni di legittimità costituzionale

The judgment of the Constitutional Court n. 111/2016 represents a revirment with respect to the previous constitutional jurisprudence on the obligation of the true interpretation, since with it would seem that the judge “a quo”, although the obligation to try to prevent the antinomy is always imposed, should no longer "prefer" the true interpretation. So the paper aims to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of this new hermeneutic approach, within what appears to be a tendency, more generally, to centralize the judgment by the constitutional judge, with the recovery of the foundations of modern constitutionalism.