The Supreme Court of Cassation, with decision no. 24084 of May 15, 2017, rejects the appeal of a Sikh ethnic Indian, already convicted of the crime by art. 4, law no. 110 of 1975, for the abusive harbor of a ritual knife (kirpan) and does not consider the “cause of justification” related to the symbolic nature of the white-weapon. The commentary gives the opportunity for a reflection on the problem of the protection of cultural identity and religious freedom in the light of the principles of civil law on the compensation of damage to their image for discriminatory reasons.
Libertà religiosa e diritto all’identità culturale: profili civilistici
Marchese A.
2017-01-01
Abstract
The Supreme Court of Cassation, with decision no. 24084 of May 15, 2017, rejects the appeal of a Sikh ethnic Indian, already convicted of the crime by art. 4, law no. 110 of 1975, for the abusive harbor of a ritual knife (kirpan) and does not consider the “cause of justification” related to the symbolic nature of the white-weapon. The commentary gives the opportunity for a reflection on the problem of the protection of cultural identity and religious freedom in the light of the principles of civil law on the compensation of damage to their image for discriminatory reasons.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
