Introduction: To compare mean best‑corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal sensitivity (RS), and bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) in patients with adult‑onset foveomacular vitelliform dystrophy (AOFVD) and healthy subjects (HSs), reporting also functional disease‑related changes in the different stages of the AOFVD disease. Materials and Methods: In this observational cross‑sectional study, a total of 19 patients (30 eyes; 12 female and 7 male) with AOFVD were enrolled, and 30 patients (30 eyes; 16 female and 14 male) were recruited as age‑matched control group (74.36 ± 9.17 years vs. 71.83 ± 6.99 years respectively, P = 0.11). All patients underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination, fundus autofluorescence and fluorescein angiography, spectral‑domain optical coherence tomography and microperimetry (MP)‑1 analysis. The data collection included mean BCVA, mean RS measured by means of MP‑1, BCEA, and central retinal thickness. Results: All the functional parameters (BCVA, RS, and BCEA) were significantly worse in AOFVD group than HS. Subgroup analysis showed that the most significant functional changes, quantified by mean BCVA, RS, and BCEA, were in the atrophic stage (P = 0.03, P = 0.01, and P = 0.001, respectively). All the functional parameters were well correlated in the different stages. Conclusions: This study further confirms the good visual prognosis in the AOFVD eyes. Fixation stability measurement using BCEA demonstrates good evaluation of visual performance integrating traditional functional parameters. It may also serve for further rehabilitative purposes in atrophic eyes.

Microperimetric evaluation in patients with adult-onset foveomacular vitelliform dystrophy

Meduri, Alessandro;
2017-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: To compare mean best‑corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal sensitivity (RS), and bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) in patients with adult‑onset foveomacular vitelliform dystrophy (AOFVD) and healthy subjects (HSs), reporting also functional disease‑related changes in the different stages of the AOFVD disease. Materials and Methods: In this observational cross‑sectional study, a total of 19 patients (30 eyes; 12 female and 7 male) with AOFVD were enrolled, and 30 patients (30 eyes; 16 female and 14 male) were recruited as age‑matched control group (74.36 ± 9.17 years vs. 71.83 ± 6.99 years respectively, P = 0.11). All patients underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination, fundus autofluorescence and fluorescein angiography, spectral‑domain optical coherence tomography and microperimetry (MP)‑1 analysis. The data collection included mean BCVA, mean RS measured by means of MP‑1, BCEA, and central retinal thickness. Results: All the functional parameters (BCVA, RS, and BCEA) were significantly worse in AOFVD group than HS. Subgroup analysis showed that the most significant functional changes, quantified by mean BCVA, RS, and BCEA, were in the atrophic stage (P = 0.03, P = 0.01, and P = 0.001, respectively). All the functional parameters were well correlated in the different stages. Conclusions: This study further confirms the good visual prognosis in the AOFVD eyes. Fixation stability measurement using BCEA demonstrates good evaluation of visual performance integrating traditional functional parameters. It may also serve for further rehabilitative purposes in atrophic eyes.
2017
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11570/3126122
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact