The objective of this article is to detail the treatment for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC). The literature presents only few contributions, with controversial results, about comparison between ‘active surveillance’ and surgery. Hemithyroidectomy is the treatment of choice for PTMC. Thyroidectomy is indicated in cases of multifocality, extrathyroid tumor growth, and familial PTMCs. Active surveillance can only be done under well-defined and controlled conditions. Collected findings and agreements with the patient must be precisely documented, also for medico-legal reasons. An observation of PTMC seems most appropriate for patients >60 years of age. In the case of observation of a PTMC, a lifelong examination of the tumor disease must be carried out, since tumor growth or metastases can still occur after 10–15 years. The follow-up periods for the ‘active surveillance’ proposed from the literature review are too short to conclude this as a real alternative

Treatment Decision Making in Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma

Giuseppe Navarra
Primo
;
Francesco Freni;Bruno Galletti;Francesco Galletti;Grazia Pagano;Andrea Cogliandolo;Alberto Barbera;Salvatore Lazzara;Gianlorenzo Dionigi
Ultimo
2018-01-01

Abstract

The objective of this article is to detail the treatment for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC). The literature presents only few contributions, with controversial results, about comparison between ‘active surveillance’ and surgery. Hemithyroidectomy is the treatment of choice for PTMC. Thyroidectomy is indicated in cases of multifocality, extrathyroid tumor growth, and familial PTMCs. Active surveillance can only be done under well-defined and controlled conditions. Collected findings and agreements with the patient must be precisely documented, also for medico-legal reasons. An observation of PTMC seems most appropriate for patients >60 years of age. In the case of observation of a PTMC, a lifelong examination of the tumor disease must be carried out, since tumor growth or metastases can still occur after 10–15 years. The follow-up periods for the ‘active surveillance’ proposed from the literature review are too short to conclude this as a real alternative
2018
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
3127237.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.44 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.44 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11570/3127237
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact