The objective of this article is to detail the treatment for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC). The literature presents only few contributions, with controversial results, about comparison between ‘active surveillance’ and surgery. Hemithyroidectomy is the treatment of choice for PTMC. Thyroidectomy is indicated in cases of multifocality, extrathyroid tumor growth, and familial PTMCs. Active surveillance can only be done under well-defined and controlled conditions. Collected findings and agreements with the patient must be precisely documented, also for medico-legal reasons. An observation of PTMC seems most appropriate for patients >60 years of age. In the case of observation of a PTMC, a lifelong examination of the tumor disease must be carried out, since tumor growth or metastases can still occur after 10–15 years. The follow-up periods for the ‘active surveillance’ proposed from the literature review are too short to conclude this as a real alternative
Treatment Decision Making in Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma
Giuseppe NavarraPrimo
;Francesco Freni;Bruno Galletti;Francesco Galletti;Grazia Pagano;Andrea Cogliandolo;Alberto Barbera;Salvatore Lazzara;Gianlorenzo Dionigi
Ultimo
2018-01-01
Abstract
The objective of this article is to detail the treatment for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC). The literature presents only few contributions, with controversial results, about comparison between ‘active surveillance’ and surgery. Hemithyroidectomy is the treatment of choice for PTMC. Thyroidectomy is indicated in cases of multifocality, extrathyroid tumor growth, and familial PTMCs. Active surveillance can only be done under well-defined and controlled conditions. Collected findings and agreements with the patient must be precisely documented, also for medico-legal reasons. An observation of PTMC seems most appropriate for patients >60 years of age. In the case of observation of a PTMC, a lifelong examination of the tumor disease must be carried out, since tumor growth or metastases can still occur after 10–15 years. The follow-up periods for the ‘active surveillance’ proposed from the literature review are too short to conclude this as a real alternativeFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
3127237.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.44 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.44 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.