Context Optimization of the partial nephrectomy (PN) procedure in terms of preservation of functional outcomes is of special importance. Objective To review the most important patient and surgical factors that may influence the three elements that ultimately define the preservation of renal function (RF) after PN: preoperative RF, quantity of parenchyma preserved, and nephron recovery from ischemic insult. Evidence acquisition A nonsystematic review of the literature was conducted. Relevant databases were searched for studies providing data on surgical, patient, and tumour factors predictive of RF preservation after PN. Evidence synthesis Many renal cell carcinoma patients have low RF at baseline or are at risk of rapid progression of chronic kidney disease. A glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of ≤45 ml/min/1.73 m2 after PN is associated with higher risk of a 50% drop in GFR or dialysis. Greater tumor size and complexity are nonmodifiable factors that predict worse postoperative RF, longer warm ischemia time (IT), and greater healthy parenchymal volume loss (HPVL). Global renal ischemic injury can be minimized using off-clamp or selective minimal renal ischemia techniques that vary from simple regional ischemia to more complex techniques such as tertiary or higher-order renal arterial branch clamping. However, the quality and quantity of parenchymal mass preserved are the main predictors of RF after PN, and IT seems to have a secondary role, as long as warm IT is limited or ischemia is hypothermic. HPVL is minimized using enucleation techniques (oncologically equivalent to traditional PN for low-grade tumors in retrospective studies) and reduction of the parenchyma incorporated in renorrhaphy. Evidence on the comparative effectiveness of the various PN surgical approaches (open, laparoscopic, robotic, and thermoablation) in terms of functional outcomes is characterized by low overall quality. Conclusions Efforts should be made to optimize the modifiable surgical factors identified for maximum RF preservation after PN. The low quality of evidence regarding the various surgical strategies for preserving RF prevents definitive conclusions. Patient summary We reviewed the literature to determine the most important modifiable and non-modifiable factors that ultimately influence renal function after partial nephrectomy. The most important factors are the preoperative renal function and the volume of healthy renal parenchyma that the surgeon can spare during tumor resection, as long as the time of renal ischemia is limited. We discuss the strategies that allow optimization of the modifiable factors, ultimately leading to maximization of renal function after partial nephrectomy

Renal preservation and partial nephrectomy: patient and surgical factors

Ficarra, Vincenzo;
2016-01-01

Abstract

Context Optimization of the partial nephrectomy (PN) procedure in terms of preservation of functional outcomes is of special importance. Objective To review the most important patient and surgical factors that may influence the three elements that ultimately define the preservation of renal function (RF) after PN: preoperative RF, quantity of parenchyma preserved, and nephron recovery from ischemic insult. Evidence acquisition A nonsystematic review of the literature was conducted. Relevant databases were searched for studies providing data on surgical, patient, and tumour factors predictive of RF preservation after PN. Evidence synthesis Many renal cell carcinoma patients have low RF at baseline or are at risk of rapid progression of chronic kidney disease. A glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of ≤45 ml/min/1.73 m2 after PN is associated with higher risk of a 50% drop in GFR or dialysis. Greater tumor size and complexity are nonmodifiable factors that predict worse postoperative RF, longer warm ischemia time (IT), and greater healthy parenchymal volume loss (HPVL). Global renal ischemic injury can be minimized using off-clamp or selective minimal renal ischemia techniques that vary from simple regional ischemia to more complex techniques such as tertiary or higher-order renal arterial branch clamping. However, the quality and quantity of parenchymal mass preserved are the main predictors of RF after PN, and IT seems to have a secondary role, as long as warm IT is limited or ischemia is hypothermic. HPVL is minimized using enucleation techniques (oncologically equivalent to traditional PN for low-grade tumors in retrospective studies) and reduction of the parenchyma incorporated in renorrhaphy. Evidence on the comparative effectiveness of the various PN surgical approaches (open, laparoscopic, robotic, and thermoablation) in terms of functional outcomes is characterized by low overall quality. Conclusions Efforts should be made to optimize the modifiable surgical factors identified for maximum RF preservation after PN. The low quality of evidence regarding the various surgical strategies for preserving RF prevents definitive conclusions. Patient summary We reviewed the literature to determine the most important modifiable and non-modifiable factors that ultimately influence renal function after partial nephrectomy. The most important factors are the preoperative renal function and the volume of healthy renal parenchyma that the surgeon can spare during tumor resection, as long as the time of renal ischemia is limited. We discuss the strategies that allow optimization of the modifiable factors, ultimately leading to maximization of renal function after partial nephrectomy
2016
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Renal_preservation_partial_2016.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 430.74 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
430.74 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11570/3128276
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 63
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 66
social impact