BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is an unmet need to better understand the effectiveness of different biologics in inflammatory bowel diseases. We aimed at performing a multicenter, real-life comparison of the effectiveness of infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) in Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: Data of consecutive patients with CD treated with IFX and ADA from January 2013 to May 2017 were extracted from the cohort of the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. We used a propensity score matching accounting for the main baseline characteristics in TNF-α inhibitor naïve and non-naïve patients. RESULTS: 632 patients (735 total treatments) were included. Among naïve patients, a clinical benefit (the sum of steroid-free remission plus clinical response) was achieved in 81.8% patients treated with ADA and in 77.6% patients treated with IFX (adjusted OR: 1.23, 95%CI 0.63-2-44, p=0.547) at 12 weeks; after one year, a clinical benefit was achieved in 69.2% of patients treated with ADA and in 64.5% patients treated with IFX (adjusted OR: 1.10, 95%CI 0.61-1.96, p=0.766). Among non-naïve patients, a clinical benefit was achieved in 61.7% of patients treated with ADA and in 68.1% of patients treated with IFX (adjusted OR: 0.72, 95%CI 0.21-2.44, p=0.600) at 12 weeks; after one year, a clinical benefit was achieved in 48.9% of patients treated with ADA and in 40.4% patients treated with IFX (adjusted OR: 1.23, 95%CI 0.54-2.86, p=0.620). CONCLUSIONS: In this propensity score-matched comparison of ADA and IFX in CD, both drugs showed high rates of clinical benefit, without significant differences between them.

A propensity score-matched comparison of infliximab and adalimumab in TNF-α inhibitors naïve and non-naïve patients with Crohn's disease: real-life data from the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SN-IBD)

Fries, Walter;Romano, Claudio;
2019-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is an unmet need to better understand the effectiveness of different biologics in inflammatory bowel diseases. We aimed at performing a multicenter, real-life comparison of the effectiveness of infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) in Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: Data of consecutive patients with CD treated with IFX and ADA from January 2013 to May 2017 were extracted from the cohort of the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. We used a propensity score matching accounting for the main baseline characteristics in TNF-α inhibitor naïve and non-naïve patients. RESULTS: 632 patients (735 total treatments) were included. Among naïve patients, a clinical benefit (the sum of steroid-free remission plus clinical response) was achieved in 81.8% patients treated with ADA and in 77.6% patients treated with IFX (adjusted OR: 1.23, 95%CI 0.63-2-44, p=0.547) at 12 weeks; after one year, a clinical benefit was achieved in 69.2% of patients treated with ADA and in 64.5% patients treated with IFX (adjusted OR: 1.10, 95%CI 0.61-1.96, p=0.766). Among non-naïve patients, a clinical benefit was achieved in 61.7% of patients treated with ADA and in 68.1% of patients treated with IFX (adjusted OR: 0.72, 95%CI 0.21-2.44, p=0.600) at 12 weeks; after one year, a clinical benefit was achieved in 48.9% of patients treated with ADA and in 40.4% patients treated with IFX (adjusted OR: 1.23, 95%CI 0.54-2.86, p=0.620). CONCLUSIONS: In this propensity score-matched comparison of ADA and IFX in CD, both drugs showed high rates of clinical benefit, without significant differences between them.
2019
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
3135681.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 273.4 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
273.4 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11570/3135681
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 28
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 29
social impact