Background Non-invasive brain stimulation is an effective treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. Aims The purpose of the two studies presented here is to compare the short- and long-term effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (t-DCS) on two samples of advanced AD patients. Methods In Study 1 26 patients were involved in a 10-day anodal vs. sham tDCS intervention stimulating the left frontotem-poral cortex. A pre–post test assessment was run using two different neurocognitive tests and EEG data. The same protocol was used in Study 2, which involved 18 different patients who underwent the same intervention 10days a month for 8months. Results Results confirmed how the t-DCS intervention was effective both in the short- and the long-term to slow down the progression of AD on specific neurophysiological domains and, to a certain extent, on neurophysiological activity.D iscussiontDCS appear to be effective and to affect differently neurocognitive and neurophysiological functions when comparing short and long-term outcomes. ConclusionsAnodal-tDCS is an effective way to slow down the progression of Alzheimer’s both in the short and long term. It can also affect the EEG patterns, but this requires a more protracted intervention.

Effects of short- and long-term neurostimulation (tDCS) on Alzheimer’s disease patients: two randomized studies

Gangemi, Antonio
Primo
;
Fabio, Rosa Angela
Ultimo
2021-01-01

Abstract

Background Non-invasive brain stimulation is an effective treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. Aims The purpose of the two studies presented here is to compare the short- and long-term effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (t-DCS) on two samples of advanced AD patients. Methods In Study 1 26 patients were involved in a 10-day anodal vs. sham tDCS intervention stimulating the left frontotem-poral cortex. A pre–post test assessment was run using two different neurocognitive tests and EEG data. The same protocol was used in Study 2, which involved 18 different patients who underwent the same intervention 10days a month for 8months. Results Results confirmed how the t-DCS intervention was effective both in the short- and the long-term to slow down the progression of AD on specific neurophysiological domains and, to a certain extent, on neurophysiological activity.D iscussiontDCS appear to be effective and to affect differently neurocognitive and neurophysiological functions when comparing short and long-term outcomes. ConclusionsAnodal-tDCS is an effective way to slow down the progression of Alzheimer’s both in the short and long term. It can also affect the EEG patterns, but this requires a more protracted intervention.
2021
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2020. long term tDCS Alzheimer.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: First on line
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 517.71 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
517.71 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Effects of short.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Versione a stampa
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 3.91 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.91 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11570/3160650
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 22
  • Scopus 52
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 50
social impact