Purpose: Data froma large European prospective observational study were analysed to describe the antiemetic prescribing pattern for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in Italian clinical practice. Methods: Post hoc analysis of the Pan European Emesis Registry in chemo-naïve adults initiating single-day highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC or MEC) for cancer. Results: A total of 211 eligible patients were enrolled in the Italian centres, 180 were included in the analyses for cycle 1; 50.6% received MEC. The use of guideline-consistent CINV prophylaxis (GCCP) varied substantially between acute and delayed phases (54.4% during the acute phase vs. 29.4% in the overall 120-hour study period, acute plus delayed phases). Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist was added to the prophylaxis with dexamethasonez5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonists in only 11.1% of patients (vs. 57.2% of the entire European study population). In the GCCP group, the complete response rate was significantly higher than that recorded in the guideline-inconsistent CINV prophylaxis (GICP) group (75.5 vs. 53.5%, P 5 0.006). Conclusion: The proportion of guideline-consistent antiemetic therapy was quite low in the Italian population as it was in the overall European population. The implementation of specific guidelines' recommendations for chemotherapeutic regimens administered according to standard protocols could be considered as a means to reduce the burden of CINV. © 2013 Edizioni Scientifiche per l'Informazione su Farmaci e Terapia.

The Pan European Emesis Registry (PEER): A critical appraisal of the Italian experience

Berretta M.;
2013-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: Data froma large European prospective observational study were analysed to describe the antiemetic prescribing pattern for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in Italian clinical practice. Methods: Post hoc analysis of the Pan European Emesis Registry in chemo-naïve adults initiating single-day highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC or MEC) for cancer. Results: A total of 211 eligible patients were enrolled in the Italian centres, 180 were included in the analyses for cycle 1; 50.6% received MEC. The use of guideline-consistent CINV prophylaxis (GCCP) varied substantially between acute and delayed phases (54.4% during the acute phase vs. 29.4% in the overall 120-hour study period, acute plus delayed phases). Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist was added to the prophylaxis with dexamethasonez5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonists in only 11.1% of patients (vs. 57.2% of the entire European study population). In the GCCP group, the complete response rate was significantly higher than that recorded in the guideline-inconsistent CINV prophylaxis (GICP) group (75.5 vs. 53.5%, P 5 0.006). Conclusion: The proportion of guideline-consistent antiemetic therapy was quite low in the Italian population as it was in the overall European population. The implementation of specific guidelines' recommendations for chemotherapeutic regimens administered according to standard protocols could be considered as a means to reduce the burden of CINV. © 2013 Edizioni Scientifiche per l'Informazione su Farmaci e Terapia.
2013
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11570/3189861
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact