The present study aimed to compare the welfare of dairy cows kept in two traditional husbandry systems (semi-intensive and intensive farming) in south-eastern Sicily. A total of 18 dairy farms (nine semi-intensive and nine intensive) were evaluated with a multi-criteria system adapted for Sicilian conditions and obtained simplifying the model of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Values of welfare measures, collected by inspections of the farms [General well-being indicators, Ventilation system, Resting areas (cubicles or bedding), Flooring, Milking parlours and waiting area, Manger and watering equipment], and those of health categories (cases of Abortions, Hypocalcaemia, Displacement of Abomasum, Acidosis/Ketosis, Enteritis, Hoof Problems, and Mastitis) obtained through the farm records, were compared using Mann-Whitney and Chi-squared tests respectively. Data showed significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) about the variables related to welfare categories such as housing ventilation system, resting area, manger, and water equipment that were better in the semi-intensive system than the intensive system. No significant differences were observed about the variables related to health indicators. The results demonstrated that in Sicily the semi-intensive farm is better than the intensive to satisfy the conditions of animal welfare.

Welfare assessment in intensive and semi-intensive dairy cattle management system in Siciy

Michela Pugliese
Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Annamaria Passantino
Secondo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Vito Biondi
Validation
;
Angela Alibrandi
Software
;
Antonina Zanghi
Supervision
;
Francesca Conte
Penultimo
Supervision
;
Gabriele Marino
Ultimo
Writing – Review & Editing
2021-01-01

Abstract

The present study aimed to compare the welfare of dairy cows kept in two traditional husbandry systems (semi-intensive and intensive farming) in south-eastern Sicily. A total of 18 dairy farms (nine semi-intensive and nine intensive) were evaluated with a multi-criteria system adapted for Sicilian conditions and obtained simplifying the model of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Values of welfare measures, collected by inspections of the farms [General well-being indicators, Ventilation system, Resting areas (cubicles or bedding), Flooring, Milking parlours and waiting area, Manger and watering equipment], and those of health categories (cases of Abortions, Hypocalcaemia, Displacement of Abomasum, Acidosis/Ketosis, Enteritis, Hoof Problems, and Mastitis) obtained through the farm records, were compared using Mann-Whitney and Chi-squared tests respectively. Data showed significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) about the variables related to welfare categories such as housing ventilation system, resting area, manger, and water equipment that were better in the semi-intensive system than the intensive system. No significant differences were observed about the variables related to health indicators. The results demonstrated that in Sicily the semi-intensive farm is better than the intensive to satisfy the conditions of animal welfare.
2021
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
9. Pugliese et al. asj.13546.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 783.11 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
783.11 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11570/3196658
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact