Background Multiple Sclerosis (MS) can be associated with personality changes. Personality traits affect the cognitive functions, mood, and psychological well-being of people with MS and their families. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate whether personality traits might be predictors of cognitive recovery in people with MS. Methods. Thirty-one patients with a diagnosis of MS were enrolled in this study. Each participant was evaluated by a neuropsychologist before (T0) and after the end of the rehabilitation treatment (T1). The Five-Factor Model (FFM) has been used to describe the basic personality structure by highlighting five personality traits: extroversion, neuroticism, conscientiousness, agreeableness, and openness. The rehabilitation program included conventional physiotherapy, speech therapy, psychological support, cognitive rehabilitation, and nutritional therapy as well as robotic rehabilitation, advanced cognitive rehabili- tation, and virtual reality. Logistic regressions are carried out to measure the changes score between T0 and T1. Results The results showed that patients had significant improvement in cognitive and behavioral functioning. Here, we considered the relationships between the scores of cognitive and emotional/behavioral domains, the five scales of the BFQ, besides the psychiatric symptoms. In particular, the mental quality of life, visuospatial and verbal long-term memory were positively influenced by the agreeableness trait, while depression was negatively affected by this trait. Conclusion Our data suggest that personality traits could influence cognitive and behavioral recovery in pa- tients with MS.

Cognitive rehabilitation outcomes in patients with Multiple sclerosis: Preliminary data about the potential role of personality traits

Avena, Giuseppe;Oddo, Valentina;
2022-01-01

Abstract

Background Multiple Sclerosis (MS) can be associated with personality changes. Personality traits affect the cognitive functions, mood, and psychological well-being of people with MS and their families. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate whether personality traits might be predictors of cognitive recovery in people with MS. Methods. Thirty-one patients with a diagnosis of MS were enrolled in this study. Each participant was evaluated by a neuropsychologist before (T0) and after the end of the rehabilitation treatment (T1). The Five-Factor Model (FFM) has been used to describe the basic personality structure by highlighting five personality traits: extroversion, neuroticism, conscientiousness, agreeableness, and openness. The rehabilitation program included conventional physiotherapy, speech therapy, psychological support, cognitive rehabilitation, and nutritional therapy as well as robotic rehabilitation, advanced cognitive rehabili- tation, and virtual reality. Logistic regressions are carried out to measure the changes score between T0 and T1. Results The results showed that patients had significant improvement in cognitive and behavioral functioning. Here, we considered the relationships between the scores of cognitive and emotional/behavioral domains, the five scales of the BFQ, besides the psychiatric symptoms. In particular, the mental quality of life, visuospatial and verbal long-term memory were positively influenced by the agreeableness trait, while depression was negatively affected by this trait. Conclusion Our data suggest that personality traits could influence cognitive and behavioral recovery in pa- tients with MS.
2022
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S2211034822000487-main.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 440.4 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
440.4 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11570/3222597
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact