The author, taking his cue from a recent article by Elio Dovere, in which legal historians are urged to confront themselves with the study of the formae of theological discourse, examines the use of exegetical techniques derived from the genus scribendi of the so-called ‘quaestiones et responsiones’ in Origen’s commentaries on the Gospels and in Ulpian’s libri ad edictum, finding clear analogies.
Sull’utilità dello studio delle formae del pensiero teologico cristiano per lo storico del diritto. Un riscontro: tracce di esegesi zetetica nei commentari di Origene e di Ulpiano.
Alessandro Cusma' Piccione
2021-01-01
Abstract
The author, taking his cue from a recent article by Elio Dovere, in which legal historians are urged to confront themselves with the study of the formae of theological discourse, examines the use of exegetical techniques derived from the genus scribendi of the so-called ‘quaestiones et responsiones’ in Origen’s commentaries on the Gospels and in Ulpian’s libri ad edictum, finding clear analogies.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
