The essay reviews various remarks about Homeric criticism in Poliziano’s writings, focusing in particular on chapter 40 of the second "Miscellanea", which deals with the exegesis of quadrupes in Ter. Andria 865). Starting from a passage of Heliodore/Oribase’s "De ligaturis", Poliziano addresses the problem of technical and scientific vocabulary, including Homeric lexicon, in the Aristotelian translations by Theodore Gaza: the chapter is an interesting, hitherto neglected, episode of his polemic with Giorgio Merula.
Dalla versione omerica alla filologia dei Miscellanea: Poliziano vs Merula
Paola Megna
In corso di stampa
Abstract
The essay reviews various remarks about Homeric criticism in Poliziano’s writings, focusing in particular on chapter 40 of the second "Miscellanea", which deals with the exegesis of quadrupes in Ter. Andria 865). Starting from a passage of Heliodore/Oribase’s "De ligaturis", Poliziano addresses the problem of technical and scientific vocabulary, including Homeric lexicon, in the Aristotelian translations by Theodore Gaza: the chapter is an interesting, hitherto neglected, episode of his polemic with Giorgio Merula.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
