Objectives: This study looked at the effect of botulinum toxin type A (BoTox-A) in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) with dysphagia due to isolated upper motor neuron (UMN) involvement or combined UMN/lower motor neuron (LMN) impairment associated with oral phase or oropharyngeal muscles involvement. Establishing whether different pathophysiologic mechanisms underlie different responses to BoTox-A treatment may have important implications for patient management.Patients and methods: We screened 35 patients with sporadic ALS with dysphagia and included in the study 20 out of 35 with upper esophageal sphincter (UES) hyperactivity. We divided these 20 patients into 2 groups, based on the presence or absence of LMN impairment. Irrespective of the groups, we treated all 20 patients with BoTox-A injected into the UES. The study outcome was dysphagia severity scored using the Penetration/Aspiration Scale (PAS), measured before and 2, 4, and 20 weeks after injection.Results: Significant mean PAS reduction was noted at weeks 2 and 4. The botulinum-dependent PAS reduction was entirely associated with the variability shown by the group of patients with no sign of LMN impairment (group 2) and was not observed in group 1.Conclusions: The significant improvement observed in patients with isolated UES dysfunction suggests that a different pathophysiology of ALS dysphagia predisposes patients to a different response to treatment with BoTox-A. This treatment may represent an alternative treatment to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) or prolong PEG-free time.
ALS dysphagia pathophysiology: differential botulinum toxin response
Restivo, Domenico A
;
2013-01-01
Abstract
Objectives: This study looked at the effect of botulinum toxin type A (BoTox-A) in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) with dysphagia due to isolated upper motor neuron (UMN) involvement or combined UMN/lower motor neuron (LMN) impairment associated with oral phase or oropharyngeal muscles involvement. Establishing whether different pathophysiologic mechanisms underlie different responses to BoTox-A treatment may have important implications for patient management.Patients and methods: We screened 35 patients with sporadic ALS with dysphagia and included in the study 20 out of 35 with upper esophageal sphincter (UES) hyperactivity. We divided these 20 patients into 2 groups, based on the presence or absence of LMN impairment. Irrespective of the groups, we treated all 20 patients with BoTox-A injected into the UES. The study outcome was dysphagia severity scored using the Penetration/Aspiration Scale (PAS), measured before and 2, 4, and 20 weeks after injection.Results: Significant mean PAS reduction was noted at weeks 2 and 4. The botulinum-dependent PAS reduction was entirely associated with the variability shown by the group of patients with no sign of LMN impairment (group 2) and was not observed in group 1.Conclusions: The significant improvement observed in patients with isolated UES dysfunction suggests that a different pathophysiology of ALS dysphagia predisposes patients to a different response to treatment with BoTox-A. This treatment may represent an alternative treatment to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) or prolong PEG-free time.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.