Objective: Vaccines are an effective means to reduce the spread of diseases, but they are sometimes met with hesitancy that needs to be understood. Method: In this study, we analyzed data from a large, cross-country survey conducted between June and August 2021 in 43 countries (N = 15,740) to investigate the roles of trust in government and science in shaping vaccine attitudes and willingness to be vaccinated. Results: Despite significant variability between countries, we found that both forms of institutional trust were associated with a higher willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Furthermore, we found that conspiratorial thinking and anti-expert sentiments predicted reduced trust in government and science, respectively, and that trust mediated the relationship between these two constructs and ultimate vaccine attitudes. Although most countries displayed similar relationships between conspiratorial thinking and anti-expert sentiments, trust in government and science, and vaccine attitudes, we identified three countries (Brazil, Honduras, and Russia) that demonstrated significantly altered associations between the examined variables in terms of significant random slopes. Conclusions: Cross-country differences suggest that local governments' support for COVID-19 prevention policies can influence populations' vaccine attitudes. These findings provide insight for policymakers to develop interventions aiming to increase trust in the institutions involved in the vaccination process.
Mediation analysis of conspiratorial thinking and anti-expert sentiments on vaccine willingness.
Chayinska, MariaMembro del Collaboration Group
2023-01-01
Abstract
Objective: Vaccines are an effective means to reduce the spread of diseases, but they are sometimes met with hesitancy that needs to be understood. Method: In this study, we analyzed data from a large, cross-country survey conducted between June and August 2021 in 43 countries (N = 15,740) to investigate the roles of trust in government and science in shaping vaccine attitudes and willingness to be vaccinated. Results: Despite significant variability between countries, we found that both forms of institutional trust were associated with a higher willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Furthermore, we found that conspiratorial thinking and anti-expert sentiments predicted reduced trust in government and science, respectively, and that trust mediated the relationship between these two constructs and ultimate vaccine attitudes. Although most countries displayed similar relationships between conspiratorial thinking and anti-expert sentiments, trust in government and science, and vaccine attitudes, we identified three countries (Brazil, Honduras, and Russia) that demonstrated significantly altered associations between the examined variables in terms of significant random slopes. Conclusions: Cross-country differences suggest that local governments' support for COVID-19 prevention policies can influence populations' vaccine attitudes. These findings provide insight for policymakers to develop interventions aiming to increase trust in the institutions involved in the vaccination process.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Blackburn et al., 2023 Mediation analysis of conspiratorial thinking and anti-expert sentiments on vaccine willingness.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: Versione editoriale
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
1.33 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.33 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
HEA-2022-0015_supplemental_materials.docx
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Materiale supplementare
Tipologia:
Altro materiale allegato (es. Copertina, Indice, Materiale supplementare, Brevetti, Spin off, Start up, etc.)
Licenza:
Non specificato
Dimensione
374.64 kB
Formato
Microsoft Word XML
|
374.64 kB | Microsoft Word XML | Visualizza/Apri |
Mediation Analysis of Conspiratorial Thinking and Anti-Expert Sentiments_Accepted Manuscript.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Post-print
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
1.18 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.18 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.