Background: Several biochemical and clinical markers have been proposed for selecting patients for active surveillance (AS). However, some of these are expensive and not easily accessible. Moreover, currently about 30% of patients on AS harbor aggressive disease. Hence, there is an urgent need for other tools to accurately identify patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Patients: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 260 patients who underwent radical prostatectonny and were eligible for AS according to the following criteria: clinical stage T2a or less, prostate-specific antigen level <10 ng/nnL, 2 or fewer cores involved with cancer, Gleason score (GS) <= 6 grade, and prostate-specific antigen density <0.2 ng/nnUcc. Methods: Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the association of patient and tumor characteristics with reclassification, defined as upstaged (pathological stage >pT2) and upgraded (GS 7) disease. A base model (age, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, and clinical stage) was compared with models considering neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) or platelets to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte to lymphocyte (MLR), and eosinophil to lymphocyte ratio (ELR). OR and 95% CI were calculated. Finally, a decision curve analysis was performed. Results: Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that NLR, PLR, and ELR upgrading were significantly associated with upgrading (ORs ranging from 2.13 to 4.13), but not with upstaging except for MLR in multivariate analysis, showing a protective effect. Conclusion: Our results showed that NLR, PLR, and ELR are predictors of Gleason upgrading, Therefore, these inexpensive and easily available tests might be useful in the assessment of low-risk PCa, when considering patients for AS. (C) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel

Neutrophil, Platelets, and Eosinophil to Lymphocyte Ratios Predict Gleason Score Upgrading in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients

Conti Andrea;
2019-01-01

Abstract

Background: Several biochemical and clinical markers have been proposed for selecting patients for active surveillance (AS). However, some of these are expensive and not easily accessible. Moreover, currently about 30% of patients on AS harbor aggressive disease. Hence, there is an urgent need for other tools to accurately identify patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Patients: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 260 patients who underwent radical prostatectonny and were eligible for AS according to the following criteria: clinical stage T2a or less, prostate-specific antigen level <10 ng/nnL, 2 or fewer cores involved with cancer, Gleason score (GS) <= 6 grade, and prostate-specific antigen density <0.2 ng/nnUcc. Methods: Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the association of patient and tumor characteristics with reclassification, defined as upstaged (pathological stage >pT2) and upgraded (GS 7) disease. A base model (age, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, and clinical stage) was compared with models considering neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) or platelets to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte to lymphocyte (MLR), and eosinophil to lymphocyte ratio (ELR). OR and 95% CI were calculated. Finally, a decision curve analysis was performed. Results: Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that NLR, PLR, and ELR upgrading were significantly associated with upgrading (ORs ranging from 2.13 to 4.13), but not with upstaging except for MLR in multivariate analysis, showing a protective effect. Conclusion: Our results showed that NLR, PLR, and ELR are predictors of Gleason upgrading, Therefore, these inexpensive and easily available tests might be useful in the assessment of low-risk PCa, when considering patients for AS. (C) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11570/3299230
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 37
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
social impact