Role of advanced CMR features in identifying a positive genotype of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Mushtaq, S.; Chiesa, M.; Novelli, V.; Sommariva, E.; Biondi, M. L.; Manzoni, M.; Florio, A.; Lampus, M. L.; Avallone, C.; Zocchi, C.; Ianniruberto, M.; Zannoni, J.; Nudi, A.; Arcudi, A.; Annoni, A.; Baggiano, A.; Berna, G.; Carerj, M. L.; Cannata, F.; Celeste, F.; Del Torto, A.; Fazzari, F.; Formenti, A.; Frappampina, A.; Fusini, L.; Ali, S. G.; Gripari, P.; Pizzamiglio, F.; Ribatti, V.; Junod, D.; Maltagliati, A.; Mancini, M. E.; Mantegazza, V.; Maragna, R.; Marchetti, F.; Muratori, M.; Sbordone, F. P.; Tassetti, L.; Volpe, A.; Saba, L.; Autore, C.; Olivotto, I.; Guaricci, A. I.; Andreini, D.; Pontone, G.

doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132554

Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited cardiovascular disease that affects approximately one in 500 people. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has emerged as a powerful tool for the non-invasive assessment of HCM. CMR can accurately quantify the extent and distribution of hypertrophy, assess the presence and severity of myocardial fibrosis, and detect associated abnormalities. We will study basic and advanced features of CMR in 2 groups of HCM patients with negative and positive genotype, respectively. Materials and methods: The study population consisted in consecutive HCM patients referred to Centro Cardiologico Monzino who performed both CMR and genetic testing. Clinical CMR images were acquired at 1.5 T Discovery MR450 scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin)) using standardized protocols T1 mapping, T2 mapping and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Population was divided in 2 groups: group 1 with HCM patients with a negative genotype and group 2 with a positive genotype. Results: The analytic population consisted of 110 patients: 75 in group 1 and 35 patients in group 2. At CMR evaluation, patients with a positive genotype had higher LV mass (136 vs. 116 g, p = 0.02), LV thickness (17.5 vs. 16.9 mm), right ventricle ejection fraction (63 % vs. 58 %, p = 0.002). Regarding the LGE patients with positive genotype have a higher absolute (33.8 vs 16.7 g, p = 0.0003) and relative LGE mass (31.6 % vs 14.6 %, p = 0.0007). On a segmental analysis all the septum (segments 2, 8, 9, and 14) had a significantly increased native T1 compared to others segments. ECV in the mid antero and infero-septum (segments 8 and 9) have lower values in positive genotype HCM. Interestingly the mean T2 was lower in positive genotype HCM as compared to negative genotype HCM (50,1 ms vs 52,4). Conclusions: Our paper identifies the mid septum (segments 8 and 9) as a key to diagnose a positive genotype HCM.