How can we imagine discussing the myth of “schizophrenic” creativity? At the end of the 19th century, Emil Kraepelin (1899) – still considered the founder of modern psychiatry – based his classification of mental disorders on the so-called psychological and linguistic turn of dementia praecox. Contemporary research in neurolinguistics and/or neuropragmatics focuses on attempts to standardize formal (linguistic) models to outline new diagnostic and therapeutic protocols to treat disorders on the schizophrenic spectrum. Thus, significant clues push in the direction of the so-called “linguistic nature” of psychoses. Beyond the actual capabilities in social cognition – for example, in linguistic usage of “metaphors” – the “psychotic” communicative-expressive need, that is, the need to “say”, to represent the delirious and hallucinatory reality, seems to be a characteristic trait of these mental disorders. After all, language is the main human device for constructing-translating thought and representing reality, and the expressive productions of patients – whether artistic, poetic, etc. – do not seem to characterize their creative abilities, but rather primarily manifest their expressive needs.

Sul mito della creatività schizofrenica On Myth of Schizoprenic Creativity

Bucca, Antonino
2025-01-01

Abstract

How can we imagine discussing the myth of “schizophrenic” creativity? At the end of the 19th century, Emil Kraepelin (1899) – still considered the founder of modern psychiatry – based his classification of mental disorders on the so-called psychological and linguistic turn of dementia praecox. Contemporary research in neurolinguistics and/or neuropragmatics focuses on attempts to standardize formal (linguistic) models to outline new diagnostic and therapeutic protocols to treat disorders on the schizophrenic spectrum. Thus, significant clues push in the direction of the so-called “linguistic nature” of psychoses. Beyond the actual capabilities in social cognition – for example, in linguistic usage of “metaphors” – the “psychotic” communicative-expressive need, that is, the need to “say”, to represent the delirious and hallucinatory reality, seems to be a characteristic trait of these mental disorders. After all, language is the main human device for constructing-translating thought and representing reality, and the expressive productions of patients – whether artistic, poetic, etc. – do not seem to characterize their creative abilities, but rather primarily manifest their expressive needs.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11570/3341320
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact