Background: Digital self-efficacy is a crucial determinant of healthcare professionals’ ability to adapt to technological innovations. Understanding its predictors among nurses and nursing students is essential for workforce readiness. Objectives: To assess the level of digital self-efficacy and examine demographic, educational, and experiential factors associated with inadequate self-efficacy. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 1081 Italian nurses and nursing students. The Digitech-S scale was used to measure digital self-efficacy, with ≥70/100 indicating adequacy. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of inadequate self-efficacy. Results: Only 47.1% of participants demonstrated adequate self-efficacy. Females had twice the odds of inadequate self-efficacy compared to males (OR = 2.038, p < 0.001). Nurses with bachelor’s degrees had 2.5 times higher odds than students (OR = 2.450, p < 0.001), while post-graduate education showed no effect. Early technology adoption before age 14 reduced the odds (OR = 0.675, p = 0.027). Each additional year of work experience decreased the odds by 4% (OR = 0.955, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Gender disparities persist in digital self-efficacy, and unexpectedly, students outperformed bachelor-level nurses. Findings highlight educational gaps and the importance of early exposure to technology. Tailored interventions are needed to strengthen digital readiness, which may improve care quality and healthcare system efficiency in the digital era.

Unlocking the Determinants of Digital and Technological Self-Efficacy: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Study Among Nurses and Nursing Students

Stievano A.;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background: Digital self-efficacy is a crucial determinant of healthcare professionals’ ability to adapt to technological innovations. Understanding its predictors among nurses and nursing students is essential for workforce readiness. Objectives: To assess the level of digital self-efficacy and examine demographic, educational, and experiential factors associated with inadequate self-efficacy. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 1081 Italian nurses and nursing students. The Digitech-S scale was used to measure digital self-efficacy, with ≥70/100 indicating adequacy. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of inadequate self-efficacy. Results: Only 47.1% of participants demonstrated adequate self-efficacy. Females had twice the odds of inadequate self-efficacy compared to males (OR = 2.038, p < 0.001). Nurses with bachelor’s degrees had 2.5 times higher odds than students (OR = 2.450, p < 0.001), while post-graduate education showed no effect. Early technology adoption before age 14 reduced the odds (OR = 0.675, p = 0.027). Each additional year of work experience decreased the odds by 4% (OR = 0.955, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Gender disparities persist in digital self-efficacy, and unexpectedly, students outperformed bachelor-level nurses. Findings highlight educational gaps and the importance of early exposure to technology. Tailored interventions are needed to strengthen digital readiness, which may improve care quality and healthcare system efficiency in the digital era.
2025
Inglese
Inglese
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
13
17
1
16
16
Internazionale
Esperti anonimi
determinants; digital competency; digital literacy; digital self-efficacy; healthcare technology; nurses; nursing education; nursing students; predictors; technology adoption
no
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Conte, G.; Arrigoni, C.; Magon, A.; De Angeli, G.; Paglione, G.; Baroni, I.; Belloni, S.; Ghizzardi, G.; Notarnicola, I.; Stievano, A.; Caruso, R....espandi
14.a Contributo in Rivista::14.a.1 Articolo su rivista
11
262
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11570/3353156
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact