Background: Restorative Proctocolectomy (RP) with Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) represents the gold-standard surgical treatment for patients requiring total colonic and rectal removal due to ulcerative colitis, familial adenomatous polyposis, and other colonic pathologies. The laparoscopic approach (L-IPAA) has been increasingly utilized in pediatric and young adult populations to enhance recovery and reduce morbidity; however, its benefits over open surgery (O-IPAA) remain uncertain. This meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes between L-IPAA and O-IPAA, focusing on complications, operative time, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to PRISMA guidelines, including comparative studies of patients <21 years undergoing IPAA. Databases searched included PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to September 2025. Primary outcomes were major intra- and post-operative complications; secondary outcomes included minor complications, operative time, and LOS. Data were analyzed using random-effects models, with risk of bias assessed via ROBINS-I and evidence quality graded using the GRADE system. Results: Eight studies encompassing 1094 patients met inclusion criteria: 412 underwent O-IPAA and 682 underwent L-IPAA. No significant differences were found in major intra-operative (OR = 0.871, p = 0.888) or major post-operative complications (OR = 0.798, p = 0.599). L-IPAA showed a trend toward fewer minor complications (OR = 0.514, p = 0.071) and demonstrated a significantly shorter hospital stay (OR = 0.480, p < 0.001). Operative time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (OR = 1.784, p < 0.001). Heterogeneity across studies was moderate to high, and the overall certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Conclusion: Both laparoscopic and open IPAA are safe and effective for pediatric and young adult patients requiring total proctocolectomy. While laparoscopic surgery entails a longer operative time, it offers a clear benefit in reducing hospital stay, with comparable complication rates. Further multicenter randomized studies are needed to validate these findings and define the optimal surgical approach.

Laparoscopic versus open ileal Pouch-Anal anastomosis in paediatric patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Arena, Salvatore
Primo
;
Cassaro, Fabiola
;
Bartolone, Agnese;Impellizzeri, Pietro;Romeo, Carmelo
2026-01-01

Abstract

Background: Restorative Proctocolectomy (RP) with Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) represents the gold-standard surgical treatment for patients requiring total colonic and rectal removal due to ulcerative colitis, familial adenomatous polyposis, and other colonic pathologies. The laparoscopic approach (L-IPAA) has been increasingly utilized in pediatric and young adult populations to enhance recovery and reduce morbidity; however, its benefits over open surgery (O-IPAA) remain uncertain. This meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes between L-IPAA and O-IPAA, focusing on complications, operative time, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to PRISMA guidelines, including comparative studies of patients <21 years undergoing IPAA. Databases searched included PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to September 2025. Primary outcomes were major intra- and post-operative complications; secondary outcomes included minor complications, operative time, and LOS. Data were analyzed using random-effects models, with risk of bias assessed via ROBINS-I and evidence quality graded using the GRADE system. Results: Eight studies encompassing 1094 patients met inclusion criteria: 412 underwent O-IPAA and 682 underwent L-IPAA. No significant differences were found in major intra-operative (OR = 0.871, p = 0.888) or major post-operative complications (OR = 0.798, p = 0.599). L-IPAA showed a trend toward fewer minor complications (OR = 0.514, p = 0.071) and demonstrated a significantly shorter hospital stay (OR = 0.480, p < 0.001). Operative time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (OR = 1.784, p < 0.001). Heterogeneity across studies was moderate to high, and the overall certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Conclusion: Both laparoscopic and open IPAA are safe and effective for pediatric and young adult patients requiring total proctocolectomy. While laparoscopic surgery entails a longer operative time, it offers a clear benefit in reducing hospital stay, with comparable complication rates. Further multicenter randomized studies are needed to validate these findings and define the optimal surgical approach.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11570/3365335
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact