Aim. – The best way to treat pregnant patients who have type 1 diabetes is still unclear. For this reason, the present study compared metabolic control and maternal–fetal outcomes in patients treated with continuous subcutaneous infusions of rapid-acting insulin analogues (CSII) or with insulin glargine and multiple daily injections of rapid-acting insulin analogues (glargine–MDI). Methods. – This retrospective multicentre study involved 144 women with type 1 diabetes, 100 of whom were using CSII and 44 glargine–MDI. Outcomes analyzed were metabolic control, diabetes complications, pregnancy outcome, perinatal morbidity and mortality, and fetal malformations. Results. – The two groups were comparable for age, prepregnancy BMI, primiparous rate and diabetes complications, although patients using CSII had longer duration of diabetes (P = 0.03) and higher White classifications (P = 0.04). In both groups, metabolic control improved during pregnancy, but good control was reached earlier among patients using CSII. At parturition, patients using CSII had lower HbA1c (6.2 ± 0.7% vs 6.5 ± 0.8%; P = 0.02) and required less insulin (P < 0.01). Weight gain was similar in both groups, and maternal–fetal outcomes did not differ. Conclusion. – In pregnant patients with type 1 diabetes, MDI and CSII are equivalent in terms of metabolic control and fetal–maternal outcomes, although patients using CSII achieved good control earlier and with less insulin.

Type 1 diabetes control and pregnancy outcomes in women treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or with insulin glargine and multiple daily injections of rapid-acting insulin analogues (glargine-MDI).

DI BENEDETTO, Antonino;
2011-01-01

Abstract

Aim. – The best way to treat pregnant patients who have type 1 diabetes is still unclear. For this reason, the present study compared metabolic control and maternal–fetal outcomes in patients treated with continuous subcutaneous infusions of rapid-acting insulin analogues (CSII) or with insulin glargine and multiple daily injections of rapid-acting insulin analogues (glargine–MDI). Methods. – This retrospective multicentre study involved 144 women with type 1 diabetes, 100 of whom were using CSII and 44 glargine–MDI. Outcomes analyzed were metabolic control, diabetes complications, pregnancy outcome, perinatal morbidity and mortality, and fetal malformations. Results. – The two groups were comparable for age, prepregnancy BMI, primiparous rate and diabetes complications, although patients using CSII had longer duration of diabetes (P = 0.03) and higher White classifications (P = 0.04). In both groups, metabolic control improved during pregnancy, but good control was reached earlier among patients using CSII. At parturition, patients using CSII had lower HbA1c (6.2 ± 0.7% vs 6.5 ± 0.8%; P = 0.02) and required less insulin (P < 0.01). Weight gain was similar in both groups, and maternal–fetal outcomes did not differ. Conclusion. – In pregnant patients with type 1 diabetes, MDI and CSII are equivalent in terms of metabolic control and fetal–maternal outcomes, although patients using CSII achieved good control earlier and with less insulin.
2011
Inglese
Francese (Altre)
STAMPA
37 (2011)
426
431
6
Internazionale
Esperti anonimi
Type 1 diabetes, Pregnancy, Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, Multiple daily injections, Glargine,
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Bruttomesso, D; Bonomo, M; Costa, S; Dal Pos, M; Di Cianni, G; Pellicano, F; Vitacolonna, E; Dodesini, Ar; Tonutti, L; Lapolla, A; DI BENEDETTO, Anton...espandi
14.a Contributo in Rivista::14.a.1 Articolo su rivista
12
262
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11570/1912941
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 63
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 50
social impact