Clinical Applications of Immuno-PET in Lymphoma: A Systematic Review

Simple Summary A systematic review of the published literature was performed to assess current clinicalapplications of immuno-PET in patients diagnosed with any histological type of lymphoma. The initial search yielded 1407 articles from PubMed/Medline and Scopus databases, but only 2 articles were found to comply with the inclusion criteria and 2 more were found during the cross-reference check. All four articles were deemed of sufficient methodological quality according to the QUADAS-2 assessment and were included in the review. Among the four included articles, three described the use of Zr-89-labelled antibodies targeting CD20+ relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas and one concerned the use of Ga-68-labelled mAb targeting CXCR4 in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Very limited literature data are currently available on the use of iPET in patients with lymphoma. However, iPET may represent a useful tool to non-invasively visualize the heterogeneous individual immunological environment, thus potentially guiding treatment-planning in lymphoma patients, and hence deserves further exploitation. Objective: Immuno-positron emission tomography (iPET) combines the sensitivity of the PET imaging technique and the targeting specificity of radio-labelled monoclonal antibodies (mAb). Its first clinical applications in humans were described in the late 1990s, and several pathologies have benefitted from this molecular imaging modality since then. Our scope was to assess current clinical applications of immuno-PET in patients with lymphoma. Therefore, a systematic review of the published literature was performed. Methods: PubMed/Medline and Scopus databases were independently searched by two nuclear medicine physicians, to identify studies describing the clinical use of immuno-PET in patients with lymphoma. Methodological quality of the included articles was assessed by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies criteria. The studies were then analyzed concerning the molecular target of interest. Results: The initial search yielded 1407 articles. After elimination of duplicates, 1339 titles/abstracts were evaluated. Only two articles were found to comply with the inclusion criteria and two more were found during the cross-reference check. Among the four included articles, three described the use of Zr-89-labelled antibodies targeting CD20+ relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas and one concerned the use of Ga-68-labelled mAb targeting CXCR4 in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Conclusions: Very limited literature data are currently available on the clinical use of iPET in patients with lymphoma. This technique is encountering obstacles in its wider use, possibly because of the need of specific facilities, unfavorable dosimetry, and unclear correlation of immuno-tracer biodistribution with patients' clinical and tumors' molecular characteristics. However, iPET may represent a useful tool to non-invasively visualize the heterogenous individual immunological environment, thus potentially guiding treatment-planning in lymphoma patients, and hence deserves further exploitation.