This work aimed to evaluate and compare the phenolic profile and some biological properties of the ripe berries methanol extracts of Juniperus oxycedrus L. subsp. oxycedrus (Joo) and Juniperus oxycedrus L. subsp. macrocarpa (Sibth. & Sm.) Ball. (Jom) from Turkey. The total phenolic content resulted about 3-fold higher in Jom (17.89 ± 0.23 mg GAE/g extract) than in Joo (5.14 ± 0.06 mg GAE/g extract). The HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS analysis revealed a similar flavonoid fingerprint in Joo and Jom, whereas a difference in their quantitative content was found (4632 lg/g extract and 12644 lg/g extract). In addition, three phenolic acids were detected in Jom only (5765 lg/g extract), and protocatechuic acid was the most abundant one. The antioxidant capacity of the extracts was evaluated by different in vitro assays: in the DPPH and in the TBA tests a stronger activity in Jom was highlighted, while Joo exhibited higher reducing power and metal chelating activity. Joo and Jom did not affect HepG2 cell viability and both extracts resulted virtually non-toxic against Artemia salina. The extracts were also studied for their antimicrobial potential, displaying efficacy against Gram-positive bacteria.
Juniperus oxycedrus L. subsp. oxycedrus and Juniperus oxycedrus L. subsp. macrocarpa (Sibth. & Sm.) Ball. berries from Turkey: Comparative evaluation of phenolic profile, antioxidant, cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities
TAVIANO, Maria Fernanda;MARINO, Andreana;TROVATO, Ada;DUGO, Paola;CACCIOLA, FRANCESCO;DONATO, Paola Agata Eustochia;MONDELLO, Luigi;MICELI, Natalizia
2013-01-01
Abstract
This work aimed to evaluate and compare the phenolic profile and some biological properties of the ripe berries methanol extracts of Juniperus oxycedrus L. subsp. oxycedrus (Joo) and Juniperus oxycedrus L. subsp. macrocarpa (Sibth. & Sm.) Ball. (Jom) from Turkey. The total phenolic content resulted about 3-fold higher in Jom (17.89 ± 0.23 mg GAE/g extract) than in Joo (5.14 ± 0.06 mg GAE/g extract). The HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS analysis revealed a similar flavonoid fingerprint in Joo and Jom, whereas a difference in their quantitative content was found (4632 lg/g extract and 12644 lg/g extract). In addition, three phenolic acids were detected in Jom only (5765 lg/g extract), and protocatechuic acid was the most abundant one. The antioxidant capacity of the extracts was evaluated by different in vitro assays: in the DPPH and in the TBA tests a stronger activity in Jom was highlighted, while Joo exhibited higher reducing power and metal chelating activity. Joo and Jom did not affect HepG2 cell viability and both extracts resulted virtually non-toxic against Artemia salina. The extracts were also studied for their antimicrobial potential, displaying efficacy against Gram-positive bacteria.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.