Forage legumes play a fundamental role in the sustainability of cropping systems, as rotating species with grain crops, intercrops, or winter cover crops. However, their compatibility with rhizobial inoculants needs context-specific studies. The objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness of three species-specific inoculants [Australian granular (AUG), Australian peat (AUP), and American peat (USP)], compared with a non-inoculated control (CNT). These were applied at the recommended and double dose on five Mediterranean forage legumes (Vicia sativa, Medicago polymorpha, Trifolium michelianum, T. subterraneum, and T. pratense). Plant growth, nodulation, and relative N₂ fixation were measured. Species-specific variations were observed for each inoculant. Across the average of legume species, AUG demonstrated the highest growth- and nodulationpromoting effects at both standard and double inoculum doses. The USP was the worst inoculant at the standard dose but induced positive effects at double dose. The relative N₂ fixation was only improved at double dose, especially by USP and AUG, whereas only AUP provided significant N₂ fixation enhancements at standard dose. Overall, the double dose was the best strategy for all tested forage legumes. These findings suggest that inoculating Mediterranean forage legumes with selected inoculants, especially at double dose, may be an effective solution to increase their N₂ fixation ability, reduce the use of mineral N fertilizers, and identify the optimal forage legume × inoculant combinations for intercropping systems with cereals.

Enhancing Mediterranean forage legume production through inoculation with elite rhizobia

Scavo, Aurelio
Primo
;
Maio, Aurora
Secondo
;
Calderone, Francesca;Toscano, Stefania;Cavallo, Carmelo;Oteri, Marianna
Project Administration
;
Furfaro, Maria Elena;Scordia, Danilo
Penultimo
;
Gresta, Fabio
Ultimo
2025-01-01

Abstract

Forage legumes play a fundamental role in the sustainability of cropping systems, as rotating species with grain crops, intercrops, or winter cover crops. However, their compatibility with rhizobial inoculants needs context-specific studies. The objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness of three species-specific inoculants [Australian granular (AUG), Australian peat (AUP), and American peat (USP)], compared with a non-inoculated control (CNT). These were applied at the recommended and double dose on five Mediterranean forage legumes (Vicia sativa, Medicago polymorpha, Trifolium michelianum, T. subterraneum, and T. pratense). Plant growth, nodulation, and relative N₂ fixation were measured. Species-specific variations were observed for each inoculant. Across the average of legume species, AUG demonstrated the highest growth- and nodulationpromoting effects at both standard and double inoculum doses. The USP was the worst inoculant at the standard dose but induced positive effects at double dose. The relative N₂ fixation was only improved at double dose, especially by USP and AUG, whereas only AUP provided significant N₂ fixation enhancements at standard dose. Overall, the double dose was the best strategy for all tested forage legumes. These findings suggest that inoculating Mediterranean forage legumes with selected inoculants, especially at double dose, may be an effective solution to increase their N₂ fixation ability, reduce the use of mineral N fertilizers, and identify the optimal forage legume × inoculant combinations for intercropping systems with cereals.
2025
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
37. Front. Agronomy, 2025, 7. 10.3389fagro.2025.1551176.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Scavo et al., 2025
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 4.62 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.62 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11570/3331273
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact